forked from rubenslte/android_kernel_samsung_msm8226
perf/core: Fix concurrent sys_perf_event_open() vs. 'move_group' race
commit 321027c1fe77f892f4ea07846aeae08cefbbb290 upstream.
Di Shen reported a race between two concurrent sys_perf_event_open()
calls where both try and move the same pre-existing software group
into a hardware context.
The problem is exactly that described in commit:
f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking")
... where, while we wait for a ctx->mutex acquisition, the event->ctx
relation can have changed under us.
That very same commit failed to recognise sys_perf_event_context() as an
external access vector to the events and thereby didn't apply the
established locking rules correctly.
So while one sys_perf_event_open() call is stuck waiting on
mutex_lock_double(), the other (which owns said locks) moves the group
about. So by the time the former sys_perf_event_open() acquires the
locks, the context we've acquired is stale (and possibly dead).
Apply the established locking rules as per perf_event_ctx_lock_nested()
to the mutex_lock_double() for the 'move_group' case. This obviously means
we need to validate state after we acquire the locks.
Change-Id: I83d360303e812232ae7aae492350813f0e79cc71
Reported-by: Di Shen (Keen Lab)
Tested-by: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Min Chong <mchong@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Fixes: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170106131444.GZ3174@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
- Use ACCESS_ONCE() instead of READ_ONCE()
- Test perf_event::group_flags instead of group_caps
- Add the err_locked cleanup block, which we didn't need before
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
CVE-2017-6001
Signed-off-by: Kevin F. Haggerty <haggertk@lineageos.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Francescodario Cuzzocrea
parent
f55a228889
commit
2f88b1f799
+57
-4
@@ -6566,6 +6566,37 @@ static void mutex_lock_double(struct mutex *a, struct mutex *b)
|
||||
mutex_lock_nested(b, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Variation on perf_event_ctx_lock_nested(), except we take two context
|
||||
* mutexes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct perf_event_context *
|
||||
__perf_event_ctx_lock_double(struct perf_event *group_leader,
|
||||
struct perf_event_context *ctx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct perf_event_context *gctx;
|
||||
|
||||
again:
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
gctx = ACCESS_ONCE(group_leader->ctx);
|
||||
if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&gctx->refcount)) {
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
if (group_leader->ctx != gctx) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex);
|
||||
put_ctx(gctx);
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return gctx;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* sys_perf_event_open - open a performance event, associate it to a task/cpu
|
||||
*
|
||||
@@ -6771,14 +6802,31 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (move_group) {
|
||||
gctx = group_leader->ctx;
|
||||
gctx = __perf_event_ctx_lock_double(group_leader, ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check if we raced against another sys_perf_event_open() call
|
||||
* moving the software group underneath us.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(group_leader->group_flags & PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If someone moved the group out from under us, check
|
||||
* if this new event wound up on the same ctx, if so
|
||||
* its the regular !move_group case, otherwise fail.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (gctx != ctx) {
|
||||
err = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto err_locked;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx);
|
||||
move_group = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* See perf_event_ctx_lock() for comments on the details
|
||||
* of swizzling perf_event::ctx.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
perf_remove_from_context(group_leader, false);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -6815,7 +6863,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
|
||||
perf_unpin_context(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
if (move_group) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex);
|
||||
perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx);
|
||||
put_ctx(gctx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
|
||||
@@ -6842,6 +6890,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
|
||||
fd_install(event_fd, event_file);
|
||||
return event_fd;
|
||||
|
||||
err_locked:
|
||||
if (move_group)
|
||||
perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
|
||||
fput(event_file);
|
||||
err_context:
|
||||
perf_unpin_context(ctx);
|
||||
put_ctx(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user